netdev - Re: [PATCH-next v2 3/4] net/sched: make sch_blackhole.c explicitly non-modular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:59:59 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v2 3/4] net/sched: make sch_blackhole.c explicitly
 non-modular

[Re: [PATCH-next v2 3/4] net/sched: make sch_blackhole.c explicitly non-modular] On 07/10/2015 (Wed 14:47) Cong Wang wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> >
> > net/sched/Kconfig:menuconfig NET_SCHED
> > net/sched/Kconfig:      bool "QoS and/or fair queueing"
> >
> > ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> 
> Is there any reason why sch_blackhole can't be a module like
> other qdisc's?
> 
> If not, I'd rather making it be a module. It is small but not often used.

As I've said in other similar threads, there are some 300+ places
where code that can't ever be modular uses modular calls and/or
introduces dead module remove code.

Hence here I am making the code consistent with its current limitations.
I'm not looking to extend functionality in code that I don't know
intimately.  I can't do that and do it reliably and guarantee it
works as a module when it has never been used as such before in 300+
places all across the kernel.

If there are interested users who want their code tristate and can vouch
that their code works OK as such, I can drop the patch(es) here ; this
is what happened with 4 of the patches I originally had in v1 of this
very series.  But a good number of the 300+ instances have been this way
since before git history began (2005) and so I wonder the value in say
extending instances like old ISA drivers from bool to tristate...

Paul.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html