netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] netlink: strict attribute checking option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:00:09 +0200
From:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] netlink: strict attribute checking
 option

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:40:11 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> I would suggest you simply add a description to the rfc via the errata
> process here: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_report.php>
> 
> The original cover letter should be enough to post there. I am also not
> sure if people do really implement this spec, at least they have a
> pointer to it, then. AFAIK the IESG will look into that then and even
> non-approved erratas will be listed on the rfc page.

Okay, we may do that. But let's postpone this discussion after we
decide what route we'll go. We'll definitely need some form of
documentation but it's preliminary to discuss what exact form when we
haven't decided whether we'll implement something like this at all.

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html