netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: cleanup resources in remove callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:17:18 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	Pavel Nakonechny <pavel.nakonechny@...tlab.ru>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: cleanup resources in
 remove callback

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:45:30PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Implement a remove callback allowing the switch driver to cleanup
> resources it used: interrupts and remapped register ranges.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> index 6f946fe..e0be318 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> @@ -1054,6 +1054,25 @@ out_unmap:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static void bcm_sf2_sw_remove(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> +	struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv = ds_to_priv(ds);
> +	void __iomem **base;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	/* Disable all interrupts and free them */
> +	bcm_sf2_intr_disable(priv);
> +
> +	free_irq(priv->irq0, priv);
> +	free_irq(priv->irq1, priv);
> +
> +	base = &priv->core;
> +	for (i = 0; i < BCM_SF2_REGS_NUM; i++) {
> +		iounmap(*base);
> +		base++;

Something for Florian to consider. Would it be possible to move to
using devm_ for interrupts and iomem? The question would be, what is
dev?

	Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html