lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:31:59 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: eric.dumazet@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, tklauser@...tanz.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] packet: do skb_probe_transport_header when we actually have data On 11/07/2015 11:29 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> > Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:53:50 -0800 > >> Well, imagine following scenario (a real one, as I use it all of >> time, thus how I discovered all trafgen traffic ends up on one slave >> only) >> >> Even if qdisc is bypassed on the bond0, the current handling does >> not prevent going to the slave qdiscs. > > Ok, depending upon the semantics Daniel intended, we may have to add > a qdisc bypass boolean bit to SKBs. It was resembling pktgen to some extend, only to be more flexible in terms of defining packet payload (trafgen, I mean). Yes, pktgen has the same issue on that regard, hmm I'm not yet sure, though, if it's worth burning an extra skb bit for both cases. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists