[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:33:34 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] netfilter: ingress: don't use nf_hook_list_active
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
nf_hook_list_active() always returns true once at least one device has
NF_INGRESS hook enabled.
Thus, don't use this function. Instead, inverse the test and use the static
key to elide list_empty test if no NF_INGRESS hooks are active.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h b/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h
index 187feab..ba7ce88 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h
@@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
-static inline int nf_hook_ingress_active(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static inline bool nf_hook_ingress_active(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- return nf_hook_list_active(&skb->dev->nf_hooks_ingress,
- NFPROTO_NETDEV, NF_NETDEV_INGRESS);
+#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
+ if (!static_key_false(&nf_hooks_needed[NFPROTO_NETDEV][NF_NETDEV_INGRESS]))
+ return false;
+#endif
+ return !list_empty(&skb->dev->nf_hooks_ingress);
}
static inline int nf_hook_ingress(struct sk_buff *skb)
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists