[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:41:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, will.deacon@....com,
daniel@...earbox.net, arnd@...db.de, yang.shi@...aro.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
zlim.lnx@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, xi.wang@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, yhs@...mgrid.com,
bblanco@...mgrid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF XADD instruction
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:31:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Adding new intrinsic to llvm is not a big deal. I'll add it as soon
> > as I have time to work on it or if somebody beats me to it I would be
> > glad to test it and apply it.
>
> This isn't a speed coding contest. You want to think about this
> properly.
That is, I don't think you want to go add LLVM intrinsics at all. You
want to piggy back on the memory model work done by the C/C++11 people.
What you want to think about is what the memory model of your virtual
machine is and how many instructions you want to expose for that.
Concurrency is a right pain, a little time and effort now will safe
heaps of pain down the road.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists