netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: PHY: Change maintainer to reviewer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:36:02 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: PHY: Change maintainer to
 reviewer

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:04:11 -0800

> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:29 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Now that there is a reviewer role, add myself as reviewer since the PHY
>> library code is maintained via the networking tree.
> 
> []
> 
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> []
>> @@ -4195,7 +4195,7 @@ F:	include/linux/netfilter_bridge/
>>  F:> 	> net/bridge/
>>  
>>  ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY
>> -M:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> +R:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>  L:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
>>  S:	Maintained
>>  F:	include/linux/phy.h
> 
> Just because the upstream path is not a tree you
> manage doesn't mean you aren't a maintainer.
> 
> I think the status should be something other than
> "Maintained" if you are not the maintainer.

Yeah, I kinda agree, Florian you are pretty much the de-facto
maintainer and I usually wait for you to review any PHY library
changes before applying them unless they are _really_ obvious.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html