netdev - Re: [PATCH net] atl1c: Improve driver not to do order 4 GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:11:27 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jcliburn@...il.com,
	chris.snook@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, nic-devel@...lcomm.com, ronangeles@...il.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] atl1c: Improve driver not to do order 4 GFP_ATOMIC
 allocation

> >>  	if (unlikely(!ring_header->desc)) {
> >> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_alloc_consistend failed\n");
> >> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get memory for DMA buffer\n");
> >>  		goto err_nomem;
> >>  	}
> >>  	memset(ring_header->desc, 0, ring_header->size);
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > So this memset() will really require a different patch to get removed ?
> > 
> > Sigh, not sure why I review patches.
> 
> Agreed, please use dma_zalloc_coherent() and kill that memset().

Ok, updated. I'll also add cc: stable, because it makes notebooks with
affected chipset unusable.

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html