netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "i40e: remove CONFIG_I40E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 5 Dec 2015 23:13:31 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	anjali.singhai@...el.com, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "i40e: remove CONFIG_I40E_VXLAN"

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 2:50 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>
> Date: Thu,  3 Dec 2015 23:49:31 -0800
>
>> This reverts commit 8fe269991aece394a7ed274f525d96c73f94109a.
>> The case where VXLAN is a module and i40e driver is inbuilt
>> will not be handled properly with this change since i40e
>> will have an undefined symbol vxlan_get_rx_port in it.
>>
>> v2: Add a signed-off-by.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>
>
> Why isn't this going via Jeff Kirsher?  And why isn't he even
> CC:'d?

Not sure why either... but for what it is worth, the revert has my blessing.

Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html