netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Add fib rules at vrf device create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:41:00 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dsa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shm@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Add fib rules at vrf device create

From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:21:51 -0700

> On 12/8/15 8:08 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> root@...ny-jessie2:~# ip ru add oif vrf-red lookup vrf-red
>>
>> root@...ny-jessie2:~# ip ru ls
>> 0:    from all lookup local
>> 32759:    from all oif vrf-red lookup vrf-red
>> 32760:    from all iif vrf-green lookup vrf-green
>> 32761:    from all oif vrf-green lookup vrf-green
>> 32762:    from all iif vrf-blue lookup vrf-blue
>> 32763:    from all oif vrf-blue lookup vrf-blue
>> 32764:    from all iif vrf-red lookup vrf-red
>> 32765:    from all oif vrf-red lookup vrf-red
>> 32766:    from all lookup main
>> 32767:    from all lookup default
> 
> d'oh. They don't fail in the sense of a user getting an error message
> but they add duplicate entries. So, if I fix the duplicity (ie., don't
> add a second one) would the patch be acceptable?

No, people need to issue all the commands in order for the configuration
to work in all kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html