netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Support administratively closing application sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:35:35 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org, ek@...gle.com,
	tom@...bertland.com, zenczykowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Support administratively closing application
 sockets

On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 14:55 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 15-12-16 10:50 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 07:43 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I see no security checks in the diag infrastructure.
> >> Up until now diag has been read-only access and therefore has been
> >> allowed for all users.
> >
> > It is still allowed to all users.
> >
> > Only the 'destroy' operation is restricted.
> 
> The question i had was the opposite when i saw this: why are
> regular users allowed to read admin (and any other users) details?;->
> On this specific feature: why, as a regular user, I cant close
> connections attributed to me (and have to use CAP_NET_ADMIN)?

I guess that we need to be careful here.

socket can be shared by fd passing to multiple users.

Who really owns it ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html