netdev - Re: [PATCH V5] ixgbe: synchronize link_up and link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:17:02 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	zyjzyj2000@...il.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	shannon.nelson@...el.com, carolyn.wyborny@...el.com,
	donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
	john.ronciak@...el.com, mitch.a.williams@...el.com,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, mark.d.rustad@...el.com
Cc:	venkat.viswanathan@...driver.com, Boris.Shteinbock@...driver.com,
	Vincent.Bourg@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] ixgbe: synchronize link_up and link_speed of a slave

On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 13:04 +0800, zyjzyj2000@...il.com wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions from Rustad, Mark D.
> According to his suggestions, the logs and source code are
> simplified.

I find it funny that this email (no patch) is got the correct subject,
yet the updated patch you sent does not.  The subject line for this
email should have been used for the updated patch you sent out.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)