netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: add per device sg_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:55:56 +0100
From:	Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@...cle.com>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman " <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...sta.com>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
	Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	"\" hannes\"@stressinduktion.org " <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Edward Jee <edjee@...gle.com>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
	Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>,
	Wei Lin Guay <wei.lin.guay@...cle.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
	Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add per device sg_max_frags for skb



On 01/06/2016 02:59 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Hans Westgaard Ry
>> Sent: 06 January 2016 13:16
>> Devices may have limits on the number of fragments in an skb they
>> support. Current codebase uses a constant as maximum for number of
>> fragments (MAX_SKB_FRAGS) one skb can hold and use.
>>
>> When enabling scatter/gather and running traffic with many small
>> messages the codebase uses the maximum number of fragments and thereby
>> violates the max for certain devices.
>>
>> An example of such a violation is when running IPoIB on a HCA
>> supporting 16 SGE on an architecture with 4K pagesize. The
>> MAX_SKB_FRAGS will be 17 (64K/4K+1) and because IPoIB adds yet another
>> segment we end up with send_requests with 18 SGE resulting in
>> kernel-panic.
>>
>> The patch allows the device to limit the maximum number fragments used
>> in one skb.
> This doesn't seem to me to be the correct way to fix this.
> Anything that adds an extra fragment (in this case IPoIB) should allow
> for the skb already having the maximum number of fragments.
> Fully linearising the skb is overkill, but I think the first fragment
> can be added to the linear part of the skb.
>
> 	David
>
>
When IpoIB handles a skb-request it converts fragments to SGEs to
be handled by a HCA.
The problem arises when the HCA have a limited number of SGEs less than 
MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
(it gets a little worse since IPoIB need to yet another segment)
I have not found any easy way of fixing this with currenct codebase.

Hans