netdev - Re: Optimizing instruction-cache, more packets at each stage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:24:55 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	brouer@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, borkmann@...earbox.net,
	marek@...udflare.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org, fw@...len.de,
	pabeni@...hat.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing instruction-cache, more packets at each stage

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:27:03 +0100

> Down in the driver layer (RX), I think it is too early to categorize
> Related/Unrelated SKB's, because we want to delay touching packet-data
> as long as possible (waiting for the prefetcher to get data into
> cache).

You don't need to touch the headers in order to have a good idea
as to whether there is a strong possibility packets are related
or not.

We have the hash available.