netdev - [Fwd: [PATCH net 0/1] af_iucv: Validate socket address length in iucv_sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:33:04 +0100
From:	Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	mschwid2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, heicars2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ursula.braun@...ibm.com
Subject: [Fwd: [PATCH net 0/1] af_iucv: Validate socket address length in
 iucv_sock_bind()]

Thx, Dave! "net" and "stable" are exactly my intended trees for this
patch. "next-tree" has been my spelling error; I meant "net-tree". Sorry
for that!

-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From:        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> To:        ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
> Cc:        mschwid2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, heicars2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
> netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
> ubraunu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
> Date:        19/01/2016 20:24
> Subject:        Re: [PATCH net 0/1] af_iucv: Validate socket address
> length in iucv_sock_bind()
> Sent by:        linux-s390-owner@...r.kernel.org
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:41:32 +0100
> 
> > this patch fixes a problem reported by Dmitry Vyukov in december. It
> is built
> > and intended for the next-tree.
> 
> A bug fix is not appropriate for the next tree.
> 
> All bug fixes should target 'net'.  You even contacted me privately
> asking me to queue this up for -stable.  Submitting something for
> net-next and wanting a -stable backport is doubly inappropriate.
> 
> Things don't go to -stable unless it's in Linus's tree.  'net' is
> for bug fixes, 'net-next' (closed right now) is for new features,
> cleanups, and fixes to code only present in 'net-next'.
> 
> Anyways I applied this to 'net' and queued it up for -stable.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
>