| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:41:23 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
narmstrong@...libre.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 08/28] net: dsa: Keep the mii bus and address in the private structure
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
> Rather than looking up the mii bus and address every time, do it once
> and setup, and keep it in the private structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 16 ++++++----------
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c
> index 34bc374882c7..d48708dfd963 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c
> @@ -19,12 +19,9 @@
>
> static int reg_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg)
> {
> - struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
> + struct mv88e6060_priv *priv = ds_to_priv(ds);
>
> - if (bus == NULL)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return mdiobus_read_nested(bus, ds->pd->sw_addr + addr, reg);
> + return mdiobus_read_nested(priv->bus, priv->sw_addr + addr, reg);
> }
>
> #define REG_READ(addr, reg) \
> @@ -40,12 +37,9 @@ static int reg_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg)
>
> static int reg_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg, u16 val)
> {
> - struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
> -
> - if (bus == NULL)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + struct mv88e6060_priv *priv = ds_to_priv(ds);
>
> - return mdiobus_write_nested(bus, ds->pd->sw_addr + addr, reg, val);
> + return mdiobus_write_nested(priv->bus, priv->sw_addr + addr, reg, val);
> }
>
> #define REG_WRITE(addr, reg, val) \
> @@ -176,6 +170,15 @@ static int mv88e6060_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device *dev)
> {
> int i;
> int ret;
> + struct mv88e6060_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ds->priv = priv;
> + priv->bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
This patch drops the checks for !bus, and thus mdiobus_write_nested can
segfault later. Maybe restore the check here?
if (!priv->bus)
return -EINVAL;
> + priv->sw_addr = ds->pd->sw_addr;
>
> ret = mv88e6060_switch_reset(ds);
> if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> index cc9b2ed4aff4..10249bd16292 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> @@ -108,4 +108,15 @@
> #define GLOBAL_ATU_MAC_23 0x0e
> #define GLOBAL_ATU_MAC_45 0x0f
>
> +struct mv88e6060_priv {
> + /* MDIO bus and address on bus to use. When in single chip
> + * mode, address is 0, and the switch uses multiple addresses
> + * on the bus. When in multi-chip mode, the switch uses a
> + * single address which contains two registers used for
> + * indirect access to more registers.
> + */
> + struct mii_bus *bus;
> + int sw_addr;
> +};
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> index 772adc7f9397..170b98f3acbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
> @@ -94,15 +94,12 @@ static int __mv88e6xxx_reg_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr, int addr,
>
> static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg)
> {
> - struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
> + struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
> int ret;
>
> assert_smi_lock(ds);
>
> - if (bus == NULL)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - ret = __mv88e6xxx_reg_read(bus, ds->pd->sw_addr, addr, reg);
> + ret = __mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ps->bus, ps->sw_addr, addr, reg);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -159,17 +156,14 @@ static int __mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr, int addr,
> static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg,
> u16 val)
> {
> - struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
> + struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
>
> assert_smi_lock(ds);
>
> - if (bus == NULL)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> dev_dbg(ds->master_dev, "-> addr: 0x%.2x reg: 0x%.2x val: 0x%.4x\n",
> addr, reg, val);
>
> - return __mv88e6xxx_reg_write(bus, ds->pd->sw_addr, addr, reg, val);
> + return __mv88e6xxx_reg_write(ps->bus, ps->sw_addr, addr, reg, val);
> }
>
> int mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg, u16 val)
> @@ -2197,6 +2191,8 @@ int mv88e6xxx_setup_common(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device *dev)
>
> ds->priv = ps;
> ps->ds = ds;
> + ps->bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
Same comment here.
> + ps->sw_addr = ds->pd->sw_addr;
>
> mutex_init(&ps->smi_mutex);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.h
> index 72f7dbbce0e2..62069b30f6e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.h
> @@ -388,6 +388,12 @@ struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state {
> */
> struct mutex smi_mutex;
>
> + /* The MII bus and the address on the bus that is used to
> + * communication with the switch
> + */
> + struct mii_bus *bus;
> + int sw_addr;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6XXX_NEED_PPU
> /* Handles automatic disabling and re-enabling of the PHY
> * polling unit.
> --
> 2.6.3
Thanks,
-v
Powered by blists - more mailing lists