netdev - Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:03:46 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix memory leak

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:03:35AM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> >> Hi Sudip,
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
> >> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > On error we jumped to the error label and returned the error code but we
> >> > missed releasing sinfo.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> >> 
> >> Should the From: and Signed-off-by: email addresses be the same?
> >
> > I think 2 years back I had a long discussion with Greg about this and
> > since then I al submitting patches like this. A small summayg of the
> > problem from that discussion:
> >
> > "we have strict DMARC check for the corporate mail server. DMARC =
> > domain based message authentication.
> > So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different
> > server than our designated server, and as a result it is marked as spam
> > in many places and I have already received a few complaints regarding
> > that."
> 
> You can add a separate "From:" line to the beginning of the commit log
> and git will use it then commiting the patch. I didn't find any
> documention but it's easy to do and should solve this.

Documentation is not needed. :)
I have done that couple of time.
I will resend this patch with the extra From: line.

regards
sudip