lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2016 00:00:08 -0800
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...el.com>,
	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	BlueZ development <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_core: Avoid mixing up req_complete and req_complete_skb

Hi Douglas,

> In commit 44d271377479 ("Bluetooth: Compress the size of struct
> hci_ctrl") we squashed down the size of the structure by using a union
> with the assumption that all users would use the flag to determine
> whether we had a req_complete or a req_complete_skb.
> 
> Unfortunately we had a case in hci_req_cmd_complete() where we weren't
> looking at the flag.  This can result in a situation where we might be
> storing a hci_req_complete_skb_t in a hci_req_complete_t variable, or
> vice versa.
> 
> During some testing I found at least one case where the function
> hci_req_sync_complete() was called improperly because the kernel thought
> that it didn't require an SKB.  Looking through the stack in kgdb I
> found that it was called by hci_event_packet() and that
> hci_event_packet() had both of its locals "req_complete" and
> "req_complete_skb" pointing to the same place: both to
> hci_req_sync_complete().
> 
> Let's make sure we always check the flag.
> 
> For more details on debugging done, see <http://crbug.com/588288>.
> 
> Fixes: 44d271377479 ("Bluetooth: Compress the size of struct hci_ctrl")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> Testing was done on a Chrome OS device on kernel 3.14 w/
> bluetooth-next backports.  Since I couldn't reliably reproduce the
> problem, I simply confirmed that existing functionality worked.
> 
> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-stable tree.

Regards

Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ