netdev - Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: pass struct rtl_stats by reference as it is more efficient

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:16:20 +0000
From:	Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Priit Laes <plaes@...es.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: pass struct rtl_stats by reference as it is more
 efficient

On 22/02/16 06:51, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Saturday 20 February 2016 22:10:27, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> passing rtl_stats by value is inefficient; the structure is over 300
>> bytes in size and generally just one field (packet_report_type)
>> is being accessed, so the pass by value is a relatively large overhead.
>> This change just affects just the rx_command_packet calls.
> 
> Why not using a const pointer?

const struct rtl_stats *const status?

> 
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>