netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net/flower: Introduce hardware offload support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:49:27 +0200
From:	Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net/flower: Introduce hardware offload
 support

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:47:19PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:24:43PM CET, amir@...ai.me wrote:
> >This patch is based on a patch made by John Fastabend.
> >It adds support for offloading cls_flower.
> >A filter that is offloaded successfuly by hardware, will not be added to
> >the hashtable and won't be processed by software.
> 
> That is wrong. User should explitly specify to not include rule into sw
> by SKIP_KERNEL flag (does not exist now, with John's recent patch we'll
> have only SKIP_HW). Please add that in this patchset.
Why? If a rule is offloaded, why would the user want to reprocess it by
software?
If the user use SKIP_HW, it will be processed by SW. Else, the user
would want it to be processed by HW or fallback to SW. I don't
understand in which case the user would like to have it done twice.

> 

[..]