[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:45:28 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 03/10] net/sched: Macro instead of
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT ifdef
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me> wrote:
> Introduce the macros tc_no_actions and tc_for_each_action to make code
> clearer.
>
> Suggested-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
> ---
> include/net/act_api.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> include/net/tc_act/tc_gact.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
> index 342be6c..2a19fe1 100644
> --- a/include/net/act_api.h
> +++ b/include/net/act_api.h
> @@ -78,11 +78,6 @@ static inline void tcf_lastuse_update(struct tcf_t *tm)
> tm->lastuse = now;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> -
> -#define ACT_P_CREATED 1
> -#define ACT_P_DELETED 1
> -
> struct tc_action {
> void *priv;
> const struct tc_action_ops *ops;
> @@ -92,6 +87,11 @@ struct tc_action {
> struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo;
> };
You also expose struct tc_action out of CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT,
which you never mention in your changelog at all.
So why?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists