lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:43:57 +0800
From:	Daode Huang <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<liguozhu@...ilicon.com>, <Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	<kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
	<lisheng011@...wei.com>, <yankejian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net 0/6] net: hns: hns driver updates

hi Dave,

Thanks for your reply, I am so sorry to interrupt your work.
Yes, the patch set should be reviewed by all the other developers.
I should not only ask you to review the patch.

I will resend all these patch after 4.6-rc-1 is released.
Thanks.

Daode.

.

On 2016/3/15 10:45, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daode Huang <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:56:02 +0800
>
>> Could you please help me to review this patch set?
> I am not reviewing anything until you guys sort out your submission
> scheme, and resend these fresh using that central maintainer.
>
> I am also not the only person in the world who is supposed to review
> all of this stuff, other developers need to help with the review
> process as well.
>
> So it is never appropriate to ask me, and only me, to review your
> work.
>
> Thanks.
>
> .
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ