netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY_RUNNING in phy_state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:23:59 +0100
From:	Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	shaohui 谢 <shh.xie@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@...escale.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"N, Mugunthan V" <mugunthanvnm@...com>, drivshin@...worx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY_RUNNING in phy_state_machine

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>
>> This patch breaks my am335x based board, where one of the CPSW slaves
>> is connected to IP175D switch chip via RMII interface. Since this
>> patch packet reception is not working.
>
> Hi Yegor
>
> Which phy is causing the problem? A PHY inside the switch?
>
> Do you have two back to back PHYs between the MAC and the switch, or
> is the CPSW RMII connected directly to the switch?

CPSW RMII is connected directly to the switch.

Yegor