netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/2] tcp: Redundant Data Bundling (RDB)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:25:03 +0100
From:	"Bendik Rønning Opstad" <bro.devel@...il.com>
To:	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Bendik Rønning Opstad <bro.devel@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>,
	Carsten Griwodz <griff@...ula.no>,
	Pål Halvorsen <paalh@...ula.no>,
	Jonas Markussen <jonassm@....uio.no>,
	Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>,
	Kenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/2] tcp: Redundant Data Bundling (RDB)

On 14/03/16 22:59, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> OK that makes sense.
>
> I left some detailed comments on the actual patches. I would encourage
> to submit an IETF draft to gather feedback from tcpm b/c the feature
> seems portable.

Thank you for the suggestion, we appreciate the confidence. We have
had in mind to eventually pursue a standardization process, but have
been unsure about how a mechanism that actively introduces redundancy
would be received by the IETF. It may now be the right time to propose
the RDB mechanism, and we will aim to present an IEFT draft in the
near future.


Bendik