netdev - Re: [PATCH] lan78xx: Protect runtime_auto check by #ifdef CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:59:16 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lan78xx: Protect runtime_auto check by #ifdef CONFIG_PM

On 03/20/2016 03:43 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If CONFIG_PM=n:
>
>      drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c: In function ‘lan78xx_get_stats64’:
>      drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c:3274: error: ‘struct dev_pm_info’ has no member named ‘runtime_auto’
>
> If PM is disabled, the runtime_auto flag is not available, but auto
> suspend is not enabled anyway.  Hence protect the check for runtime_auto
> by #ifdef CONFIG_PM to fix this.
>
> Fixes: a59f8c5b048dc938 ("lan78xx: add ndo_get_stats64")
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> ---
> Alternatively, we can add a dev_pm_runtime_auto_is_enabled() wrapper to
> include/linux/pm.h, which always return false if CONFIG_PM is disabled.
>
> The only other user in non-core code (drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c) has a
> big #ifdef CONFIG_PM check around all PM-related code.
>
> Thoughts?

Not that it matters anymore since David reverted the original patch,
but my reason for not sending a similar patch was that I wasn't sure
if .runtime_auto should be accessed from drivers in the first place,
or if there is some logical problem with the code.

Guenter

> ---
>   drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> index d36d5ebf37f355f2..7b9ac47b2ecf9905 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> @@ -3271,7 +3271,9 @@ struct rtnl_link_stats64 *lan78xx_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev,
>   	 * periodic reading from HW will prevent from entering USB auto suspend.
>   	 * if autosuspend is disabled, read from HW.
>   	 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>   	if (!dev->udev->dev.power.runtime_auto)
> +#endif
>   		lan78xx_update_stats(dev);
>
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->stats.access_lock);
>