netdev - RE: [PATCH] lan78xx: Protect runtime_auto check by #ifdef CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:09:13 +0000
From:	<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To:	<stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:	<oneukum@...e.com>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux@...ck-us.net>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] lan78xx: Protect runtime_auto check by #ifdef CONFIG_PM

> > > But this leaves open the issue that querying the device too often will
> > > prevent it from going into autosuspend.  It seems to me that the best
> > > way to deal with this is to make sure that the autosuspend timeout is
> > > shorter than the interal between queries, not to make the querying
> > > conditional on !runtime_auto.
> >
> > Short autosuspend timeout can affect performance. For instance our
> experiments showed that
> > shorter than 10sec timeout made Ethernet performance degrade because
> of wakeup delays.
> > So, just putting shorter timeout may have some side effects.
> 
> Sure.  This just means that you need a long statistics interval --
> longer than the autosuspend timeout.  That's why I suggested making the
> interval adjustable.

What do you mean statistics interval?
Interval calling ndo_get_stats64 or another thread/timer or else getting statistics?

Thanks.
Woojung