netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2016 18:38:51 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 11:31 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/ipv4/udp.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d894ba18d4e4 ("soreuseport: fix ordering for mixed v4/v6 sockets")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   ca065d0cf80f ("udp: no longer use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I tried to fixed it up (see below).  Unfortunately,
> hlist_add_tail_rcu() does not exist.  So instead I have reverted commit
> d894ba18d4e4 ("soreuseport: fix ordering for mixed v4/v6 sockets") for
> today.

Hi Stephen

Craig warned that this would happen indeed, and provided a net-next
patch, to help David with this conflict.

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/611093/

Thanks