netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:43:32 -0700
From:	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_GETSTATS message to
 dump link stats

On 4/18/16, 8:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:10:19 -0700
>
>> This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS message to query link stats via
>> netlink from the kernel. RTM_NEWLINK also dumps stats today, but
>> RTM_NEWLINK returns a lot more than just stats and is expensive in
>> some cases when frequent polling for stats from userspace is a
>> common operation.
> I'm holding off on this until we sort out the 64-bit netlink
> attribute alignment issue.
sure,
>
> Meanwhile, I'll some kind of a fix into the tree for the
> rtnl_fill_stats() change so that it doesn't cause unaligned
> accesses.
>
> I just tested out a clever idea, where for architectures where
> unaligned accesses is a problem, we insert a zero length NOP attribute
> before the 64-bit stats.  This makes it properly aligned.  A quick
> hack patch just passed testing on my sparc64 box, but I'll go over it
> some more.
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index bb3a90b..5ffdcb3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ enum {
>  	IFLA_PROTO_DOWN,
>  	IFLA_GSO_MAX_SEGS,
>  	IFLA_GSO_MAX_SIZE,
> +	IFLA_PAD,
>  	__IFLA_MAX
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index a7a3d34..b192576 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -1052,6 +1052,15 @@ static noinline_for_stack int rtnl_fill_stats(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	struct rtnl_link_stats64 *sp;
>  	struct nlattr *attr;
>  
> +	/* Add a zero length NOP attribute so that the nla_data()
> +	 * of the IFLA_STATS64 will be 64-bit aligned.
> +	 */
> +#ifndef HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> +	attr = nla_reserve(skb, IFLA_PAD, 0);
> +	if (!attr)
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +#endif
> +
>  	attr = nla_reserve(skb, IFLA_STATS64,
>  			   sizeof(struct rtnl_link_stats64));
>  	if (!attr)
>
that is cleaver :)

thanks!