netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH iproute2 v2 1/1] tc: introduce IFE action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:36:57 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemming@...cade.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"phil@....cc" <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH iproute2 v2 1/1] tc: introduce IFE action

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:27:39 +0000
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:

> > The code has also gotten deeply intended creating lots of lines that are too long.
> >  
> 
> Is this you or the script saying the above? How is the conclusion that
> we have deep indentation come about?
> I checked there are some code lines that are > 80 characters because
> it doesnt make sense to break them down.

I use checkpatch from kernel source to check iproute code now.