netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: avoid some atomic ops when FASYNC is not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	edumazet@...gle.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: avoid some atomic ops when FASYNC is
 not used

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:39:31 -0700

> We can avoid some atomic operations on sockets not using FASYNC

I guess a user can do weird things and set/clear the FASYNC bit in the
middle of the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_ bit being set, and reset the FASYNC bit
later and the SOCKWQ_* state is stale.

However, that's probably not worth handling explicitly.

Series applied, thanks.