lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:50:20 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: alexander.duyck@...il.com Cc: shmulik.ladkani@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ecree@...arflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:29:56 -0700 > I don't really see the point of using an underscore before and after > that statement. If it was only one or two words it might work for > emphasis but the statement is large enough that starting it with an > underscore just makes it harder to read. Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists