lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:56:00 -0700
From:	Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper

Hi Daniel,

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 01:46 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
>>
>> url:
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zi-Shen-Lim/arm64-bpf-implement-bpf_tail_call-helper/20160605-060435
>> config: arm64-defconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
>> reproduce:
>>          wget
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          make.cross ARCH=arm64
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     In file included from arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:21:0:
>>     include/linux/bpf.h: In function 'bpf_prog_get':
>>>>
>>>> include/linux/bpf.h:235:9: error: implicit declaration of function
>>>> 'ERR_PTR' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>>       return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>>              ^
>>     include/linux/bpf.h:235:9: warning: return makes pointer from integer
>> without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>>     In file included from include/linux/rwsem.h:17:0,
>>                      from include/linux/mm_types.h:10,
>>                      from include/linux/sched.h:27,
>>                      from arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h:25,
>>                      from arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:23,
>>                      from include/linux/stat.h:5,
>>                      from include/linux/compat.h:12,
>>                      from include/linux/filter.h:10,
>>                      from arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:22:
>>     include/linux/err.h: At top level:
>>>>
>>>> include/linux/err.h:23:35: error: conflicting types for 'ERR_PTR'
>>
>>      static inline void * __must_check ERR_PTR(long error)
>>                                        ^
>>     In file included from arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:21:0:
>>     include/linux/bpf.h:235:9: note: previous implicit declaration of
>> 'ERR_PTR' was here
>>       return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>>              ^
>>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
>
> Looks like including linux/bpf.h at the very beginning causes issues when
> bpf
> syscall is disabled. We should probably just include linux/err.h from bpf.h.

How about the attached patch? Fixes compilation error on build
!CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.

Also, should this patch be sent to net or net-next (along with this series)?

Thanks,
z

View attachment "0001-bpf-fix-missing-header-inclusion.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2223 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists