netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:33:27 -0700
From:	Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 06:56 AM, Z Lim wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> How about the attached patch? Fixes compilation error on build
>> !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.
>>
>> Also, should this patch be sent to net or net-next (along with this
>> series)?
>
>
> Looks good, feel free to add:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Thanks Daniel!

>
> I think net-next along with your series should be fine since the issue
> first appeared there. Thanks, Zi!

Sounds good. I'll include this as patch 1/4 (so it doesn't trip
kbuildbot) when I send out v2.