netdev - Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: fix uninitialized variable use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:48:52 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: fix uninitialized variable use

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> Hashing the peer key was introduced for AF_INET, but gcc
> warns about the rxrpc_peer_hash_key function returning uninitialized
> data for any other value of srx->transport.family:
> 
> net/rxrpc/peer_object.c: In function 'rxrpc_peer_hash_key':
> net/rxrpc/peer_object.c:57:15: error: 'p' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> 
> Assuming that nothing else can be set here, this changes the
> function to just return zero in case of an unknown address
> family.

I'm actually more tempted to put a BUG() in there because if any new family
support (say AF_INET6) is added, I want to make sure I catch all the places.

David