lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:35:18 -0700
From:	Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Backport bpf: try harder on clones when writing into skb? [Commit: 3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22]

Does it make sense to backport
3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22 from 4.6 to the longterm
(4.4) release? I can trivially recreate the issue represented by
3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22 by attaching a eBPF filter
that clones an ingress ICMP packet, and then tries to set the
destination MAC address.

It seems like the patch applies cleanly to 4.4. I cherry-picked it,
and rebuilt my kernel, and at least in the trivial test case passes.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ