[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:55:37 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over
xenbus_gather()
On 07/07/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... for single items being collected: It is more typesafe (as the
> compiler can check format string and to-be-written-to variable match)
> and requires one less parameter to be passed.
Do not split commit messages between the subject and the body in this
way. The body should be a complete description of the commit,
independent of the subject.
It's annoying to find only half a sentence in the body and have to go
re-read the subject again.
e.g.,
"xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
xenbus_scanf() is preferred over xenbus_gather() because: a) the
compiler can check the types match the format; and b) one less parameter
is needed.
Use xenbus_scanf() instead of xenbus_gather() when reading only a single
key."
I think almost all of your commit messages suffer from this, please redo
them all.
> --- 4.7-rc6-prefer-xenbus_scanf.orig/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
> +++ 4.7-rc6-prefer-xenbus_scanf/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
> @@ -842,16 +842,16 @@ static int connect_ctrl_ring(struct back
> unsigned int evtchn;
> int err;
>
> - err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend,
> - "ctrl-ring-ref", "%u", &val, NULL);
> - if (err)
> + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend,
> + "ctrl-ring-ref", "%u", &val);
> + if (err <= 0)
< 0
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists