netdev - RE: [PATCH v5 5/8] thunderbolt: Networking state machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 31 Jul 2016 11:58:41 +0000
From:	"Levy, Amir (Jer)" <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>
To:	Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
CC:	"andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	thunderbolt-linux <thunderbolt-linux@...el.com>,
	"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/8] thunderbolt: Networking state machine

On Thu, Jul 28 2016, 02:35 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:15:18AM +0300, Amir Levy wrote:
> > +				nhi_ctxt->net_devices[
> > +					port_num].medium_sts =
> 
> Looks like a carriage return slipped in here.

Will be fixed.

> 
> In patch [4/8], I've found it a bit puzzling that FW->SW responses and
> FW->SW notifications are defined in icm_nhi.c, whereas SW->FW commands
> are defined in net.h. It would perhaps be more logical to have them all in the
> header file. The FW->SW responses and SW->FW commands are almost
> identical, there are odd spelling differences (CONNEXION vs.
> CONNECTION).

Will move them to the header and will change to CONNECTION.

> 
> It would probably be good to explain the PDF acronym somewhere.

Will explain in the enum.

> 
> I've skimmed over all patches in the series, too superficial to provide a
> Reviewed-by, it's just too much code to review thoroughly and I also lack the
> hardware to test it, but broadly this LGTM.

Thank you for the review.