netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH v3 2/3] e1000: add initial XDP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:28:03 +0000
From:   "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "William Tu" <u9012063@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH v3 2/3] e1000: add initial
        XDP support

Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:

> I've looked through qemu and it appears only emulate e1k and tg3.
> The latter is still used in the field, so the risk of touching
> it is higher.

I have no idea what makes you think that e1k is *not* "used in the field".   
I grant you it probably is used more virtualized than not these days, but  
it certainly exists and is used. You can still buy them new at Newegg for  
goodness sakes!

Maybe I'll go home and plug in my old e100 into my machine that still has a  
PCI slot, just for old times sake. Oh darn, I have a SCSI card in that  
slot...

--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)