netdev - Re: [RFC 00/11] QLogic RDMA Driver (qedr) RFC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:39:34 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Cc:     Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>,
        Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>,
        Ram Amrani <Ram.Amrani@...gic.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
        Michal Kalderon <Michal.Kalderon@...gic.com>,
        Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@...gic.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] QLogic RDMA Driver (qedr) RFC

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:48:00AM +0000, Mintz, Yuval wrote:
> >> While this might work, I personally dislike it as I find it
> >> counter-intuitive when going over the code -
> >> I don't expect driver to locally modify the inclusion path.
> >> Besides, we're going to [eventually] a whole suite of drivers based
> >> on the qed module, some of which would reside under drivers/scsi;
> >> Not sure it's best to have 3 or 4 different drivers privately include the
> >> same directory under a different subsystem.
>
> > I agree with you that orcdma's way can be valuable for small drivers.
>
> > Orcmda has small shared headers set and doesn't need to change them rapidly
> > to support different devices.
>
> > I thought to place them in similar directory to include/soc/* and remove
> > from include/linux/. We have include/rdma/ and it looks like a good
> > candidate.
>
> I'm perfectly fine with relocating those to a different directory under include/,
> although using 'rdma' doesn't sound like a good fit [as the headers would be
> included by ethernet, scsi and rdma drivers].
> Are there good existing alternatives?

There is nothing that I can name.

>
> Regardless, I don't believe this should be part of the initial submission,
> as it would involve in relocating existing networking headers as well.
> I think we can move those at leisure later on.

Sure, it is good time and context to discuss, but orthogonal to this
submission.

>
> [We're in the middle of transitioning our e-mails from qlogic -> cavium,
> so sorry if things become corrupted]

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)