lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: prepare skbs for better sack shifting

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:33:02 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> With large BDP TCP flows and lossy networks, it is very important
> to keep a low number of skbs in the write queue.
> 
> RACK and SACK processing can perform a linear scan of it.
> 
> We should avoid putting any payload in skb->head, so that SACK
> shifting can be done if needed.
> 
> With this patch, we allow to pack ~0.5 MB per skb instead of
> the 64KB initially cooked at tcp_sendmsg() time.
> 
> This gives a reduction of number of skbs in write queue by eight.
> tcp_rack_detect_loss() likes this.
> 
> We still allow payload in skb->head for first skb put in the queue,
> to not impact RPC workloads.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>

Applied.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ