netdev - [PATCH net] net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in ip_idents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:06:17 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in
 ip_idents_reserve()

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Jiri Pirko reported an UBSAN warning happening in ip_idents_reserve()

[] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:156:11
[] signed integer overflow:
[] -2117905507 + -695755206 cannot be represented in type 'int'

Since we do not have uatomic_add_return() yet, use atomic_cmpxchg()
so that the arithmetics can be done using unsigned int.

Fixes: 04ca6973f7c1 ("ip: make IP identifiers less predictable")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
---
David, Jiri, I removed the prandom_u32() stuff in favor of a traditional
loop to meet stable requirements. Thanks !

 net/ipv4/route.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index b52496fd51075821c39435f50ac62f813967aecc..654a9af201366887652a4e19a6f1261e5e747056 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -476,12 +476,18 @@ u32 ip_idents_reserve(u32 hash, int segs)
 	atomic_t *p_id = ip_idents + hash % IP_IDENTS_SZ;
 	u32 old = ACCESS_ONCE(*p_tstamp);
 	u32 now = (u32)jiffies;
-	u32 delta = 0;
+	u32 new, delta = 0;
 
 	if (old != now && cmpxchg(p_tstamp, old, now) == old)
 		delta = prandom_u32_max(now - old);
 
-	return atomic_add_return(segs + delta, p_id) - segs;
+	/* Do not use atomic_add_return() as it makes UBSAN unhappy */
+	do {
+		old = (u32)atomic_read(p_id);
+		new = old + delta + segs;
+	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(p_id, old, new) != old);
+
+	return new - segs;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_idents_reserve);