| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:59:03 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cris-kernel@...s.com, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter
with gup_flags
On Thu 13-10-16 01:20:18, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> This patch removes the write parameter from __access_remote_vm() and replaces it
> with a gup_flags parameter as use of this function previously _implied_
> FOLL_FORCE, whereas after this patch callers explicitly pass this flag.
>
> We make this explicit as use of FOLL_FORCE can result in surprising behaviour
> (and hence bugs) within the mm subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
So I'm not convinced this (and the following two patches) is actually
helping much. By grepping for FOLL_FORCE we will easily see that any caller
of access_remote_vm() gets that semantics and can thus continue search
accordingly (it is much simpler than searching for all get_user_pages()
users and extracting from parameter lists what they actually pass as
'force' argument). Sure it makes somewhat more visible to callers of
access_remote_vm() that they get FOLL_FORCE semantics but OTOH it also
opens a space for issues where a caller of access_remote_vm() actually
wants FOLL_FORCE (and currently all of them want it) and just mistakenly
does not set it. All in all I'd prefer to keep access_remote_vm() and
friends as is...
Honza
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> mm/nommu.c | 9 ++++++---
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 20a9adb..79ebed3 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3869,14 +3869,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_access_phys);
> * given task for page fault accounting.
> */
> static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> - unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len, int write)
> + unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> void *old_buf = buf;
> - unsigned int flags = FOLL_FORCE;
> -
> - if (write)
> - flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
> + int write = gup_flags & FOLL_WRITE;
>
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> /* ignore errors, just check how much was successfully transferred */
> @@ -3886,7 +3883,7 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct page *page = NULL;
>
> ret = get_user_pages_remote(tsk, mm, addr, 1,
> - flags, &page, &vma);
> + gup_flags, &page, &vma);
> if (ret <= 0) {
> #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> break;
> @@ -3945,7 +3942,12 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> void *buf, int len, int write)
> {
> - return __access_remote_vm(NULL, mm, addr, buf, len, write);
> + unsigned int flags = FOLL_FORCE;
> +
> + if (write)
> + flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
> +
> + return __access_remote_vm(NULL, mm, addr, buf, len, flags);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3958,12 +3960,17 @@ int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> int ret;
> + unsigned int flags = FOLL_FORCE;
>
> mm = get_task_mm(tsk);
> if (!mm)
> return 0;
>
> - ret = __access_remote_vm(tsk, mm, addr, buf, len, write);
> + if (write)
> + flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
> +
> + ret = __access_remote_vm(tsk, mm, addr, buf, len, flags);
> +
> mmput(mm);
>
> return ret;
> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index 70cb844..bde7df3 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> @@ -1809,9 +1809,10 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct fault_env *fe,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_map_pages);
>
> static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> - unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len, int write)
> + unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + int write = gup_flags & FOLL_WRITE;
>
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
> @@ -1853,7 +1854,8 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> void *buf, int len, int write)
> {
> - return __access_remote_vm(NULL, mm, addr, buf, len, write);
> + return __access_remote_vm(NULL, mm, addr, buf, len,
> + write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1871,7 +1873,8 @@ int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, void *buf, in
> if (!mm)
> return 0;
>
> - len = __access_remote_vm(tsk, mm, addr, buf, len, write);
> + len = __access_remote_vm(tsk, mm, addr, buf, len,
> + write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0);
>
> mmput(mm);
> return len;
> --
> 2.10.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists