netdev - Re: concurrent rhashtable test failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:11:46 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: concurrent rhashtable test failure

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:11:32PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On m68k/ARAnyM, test_rhashtable fails with:
>>
>>     Test failed: thread 0 returned: -4
>>
>> (-4 = -EINTR)
>
> How reproducible is this? I wonder why out of the ten threads only the
> first one fails.

100% reproducible.

Does it need SMP?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds