netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: return back transport in __sctp_rcv_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:25:08 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: return back transport in __sctp_rcv_init_lookup

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:42:35AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
>> Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
>> looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in
>> sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this,
>> even if it found the transport, it was still initializing chunk->transport
>> with null instead.
>>
>> This patch is to return the transport back through transport pointer
>> that is from __sctp_rcv_lookup_harder().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
>> ---
>
> Patch looks good now but you have to either repost the entire series
> altogether, or repost the series to remove this patch from it.
Ah, sorry, will repost the entire series altogether.

>
>   Marcelo
>