netdev - Re: [PATCH net] sctp: assign assoc_id earlier in __sctp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2016 18:45:26 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: assign assoc_id earlier in __sctp_connect

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> sctp_wait_for_connect() currently already holds the asoc to keep it
> alive during the sleep, in case another thread release it. But Andrey
> Konovalov and Dmitry Vyukov reported an use-after-free in such
> situation.
>
> Problem is that __sctp_connect() doesn't get a ref on the asoc and will
> do a read on the asoc after calling sctp_wait_for_connect(), but by then
> another thread may have closed it and the _put on sctp_wait_for_connect
> will actually release it, causing the use-after-free.
>
> Fix is, instead of doing the read after waiting for the connect, do it
> before so, and avoid this issue as the socket is still locked by then.
> There should be no issue on returning the asoc id in case of failure as
> the application shouldn't trust on that number in such situations
> anyway.
>
> This issue doesn't exist in sctp_sendmsg() path.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>