netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_flower: verify root pointer before dereferncing it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:48:44 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_flower: verify root pointer
 before dereferncing it

Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:25:26PM CET, roid@...lanox.com wrote:
>tp->root is being allocated in init() time and kfreed in destroy()
>however it is being dereferenced in classify() path.
>
>We could be in classify() path after destroy() was called and thus 
>tp->root is null. Verifying if tp->root is null in classify() path 
>is enough because it's being freed with kfree_rcu() and classify() 
>path is under rcu_read_lock().
>
>Fixes: 1e052be69d04 ("net_sched: destroy proto tp when all filters are gone")
>Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
>Cc: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>

This is correct

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

The other way to fix this would be to move tp->ops->destroy call to
call_rcu phase. That would require bigger changes though. net-next
perhaps?



>---
>
>Hi Cong, all
>
>As stated above, the issue was introduced with commit 1e052be69d04 ("net_sched: destroy 
>proto tp when all filters are gone"). This patch provides a fix only for cls_flower where 
>I succeeded in reproducing the issue. Cong, if you can/want to come up with a fix that
>will be applicable for all the others classifiners, I am fine with that.
>
>Thanks,
>Roi
>
>
> net/sched/cls_flower.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>index e8dd09a..88a26c4 100644
>--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int fl_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tcf_proto *tp,
> 	struct fl_flow_key skb_mkey;
> 	struct ip_tunnel_info *info;
> 
>-	if (!atomic_read(&head->ht.nelems))
>+	if (!head || !atomic_read(&head->ht.nelems))
> 		return -1;
> 
> 	fl_clear_masked_range(&skb_key, &head->mask);
>-- 
>2.7.4
>