lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:29:38 -0800
From:   "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:     "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface Controller
 (VNIC) Bus driver

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:15:45AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> And will move the hfi_vnic module under
>> ‘drivers/infiniband/ulp/hfi_vnic’.
>
>I would prefer drivers/net/ethernet
>
>This is clearly not a ULP since it doesn't use verbs.
>

I understand it is not using verbs, but the control path (ib_device client) is 
using verbs (IB MAD).
Our prefernce is to keep it somewhere under drivers/infiniband. Summarizing 
reasons again here,

- VNIC control driver (ib_device client) is an IB MAD agent.
- It is purly a software construct, encapsualtes ethernet packets in Omni-path 
packet and depends on hfi1 driver here for HW access.

Doug,
Any comments?

>Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ