netdev - Re: [patch net v2] net: fec: fix compile with CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:26:52 +0300
From:   Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     lkp@...el.com, kbuild-all@...org, fugang.duan@....com,
        troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com, andrew@...n.ch, eric@...int.com,
        tremyfr@...il.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, cphealy@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net v2] net: fec: fix compile with CONFIG_M5272

> From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:55:04 +0300
> 
>> Aieee   I was typing too fast today, sorry...
>>
>> send separate "fix for the fix", or re-send patch without that silly typo?
> 
> If the patch hasn't been applied yet, you resend a fixed version of the
> patch, always.

Ok, will repost shortly.

What I don't understand is - how could test robot fetch it before it was
applied?

Nikita