netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:05:25 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_bpf: support ebpf

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:59:09PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 23:40 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> 
> > Fair enough, I have no objections to the patch.
> 
> An additional question is about PATH_MAX :
> 
> Is it guaranteed to stay at 4096 forever ?
> 
> To be safe, maybe we should use a constant of our own.

Right, this reminds me we have to fix something else.

So constant of our own plus something smaller, if possible, would be
good to go. Thanks.