lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  6 Dec 2016 00:23:00 +0100
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH next] Revert "dctcp: update cwnd on congestion event"

Neal Cardwell says:
 If I am reading the code correctly, then I would have two concerns:
 1) Has that been tested? That seems like an extremely dramatic
    decrease in cwnd. For example, if the cwnd is 80, and there are 40
    ACKs, and half the ACKs are ECE marked, then my back-of-the-envelope
    calculations seem to suggest that after just 11 ACKs the cwnd would be
    down to a minimal value of 2 [..]
 2) That seems to contradict another passage in the draft [..] where it
    sazs:
       Just as specified in [RFC3168], DCTCP does not react to congestion
       indications more than once for every window of data.

Neal is right.  Fortunately we don't have to complicate this by testing
vs. current rtt estimate, we can just revert the patch.

Normal stack already handles this for us: receiving ACKs with ECE
set causes a call to tcp_enter_cwr(), from there on the ssthresh gets
adjusted and prr will take care of cwnd adjustment.

Fixes: 4780566784b396 ("dctcp: update cwnd on congestion event")
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
index bde22ebb92a8..5f5e5936760e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
@@ -188,8 +188,8 @@ static void dctcp_ce_state_1_to_0(struct sock *sk)
 
 static void dctcp_update_alpha(struct sock *sk, u32 flags)
 {
+	const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 	struct dctcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
-	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 	u32 acked_bytes = tp->snd_una - ca->prior_snd_una;
 
 	/* If ack did not advance snd_una, count dupack as MSS size.
@@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static void dctcp_update_alpha(struct sock *sk, u32 flags)
 		WRITE_ONCE(ca->dctcp_alpha, alpha);
 		dctcp_reset(tp, ca);
 	}
-
-	if (flags & CA_ACK_ECE) {
-		unsigned int cwnd = dctcp_ssthresh(sk);
-
-		if (cwnd != tp->snd_cwnd)
-			tp->snd_cwnd = cwnd;
-	}
 }
 
 static void dctcp_state(struct sock *sk, u8 new_state)
-- 
2.7.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ